jetpack - 精东影业 Aviation news Fri, 03 May 2024 14:18:47 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.5.5 /images/cropped-logo-sm-32x32.png jetpack - 精东影业 32 32 eVTOLs beware: why some of aviation精东影业 biggest promises ended in failure聽 /articles/evtol-aircraft-fail-industry-concept /articles/evtol-aircraft-fail-industry-concept#comments Sat, 04 May 2024 03:03:00 +0000 /?p=95403 For those passionate about the world of aviation and flight, it is an incredibly exciting time to be…

The post eVTOLs beware: why some of aviation精东影业 biggest promises ended in failure聽 appeared first on 精东影业.]]>
For those passionate about the world of aviation and flight, it is an incredibly exciting time to be alive.  

The COVID-19 pandemic was a huge, unprecedented body blow to the aviation industry, but the future is looking remarkedly brighter than where it once was, despite Boeing精东影业 current problems over safety. 

Only last month India精东影业 biggest budget airline, IndiGo, announced an order for up to 100 Airbus A350s, representing the carrier精东影业 first leap into the long-haul market and a sure sign that the industry is expanding.聽聽

And the United Kingdom精东影业 largest airport, London-Heathrow (LHR) announced that the first financial quarter in 2024 was its busiest start to the year on record and the outlook for the entire year is very much the same.聽聽

What’s more, the aviation sector is on the cusp of new, innovative, and revolutionary concepts that have the potential to reshape the entire way populations travel. 

Among the most significant are hydrogen powered aircraft, electric regional planes, electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft and supersonic commercial flights.  

However, by far it is the subject and discussion around eVTOL aircraft that is causing the biggest stir with increasing numbers of newspaper column inches dedicated to the advancement of the humble 鈥楩lying Taxi鈥.聽

Why is everyone talking about eVTOLs?聽

Archer Aviation Midnight eVTOL
Archer Aviation

The evolution of eVTOL aircraft taps into the part of the brain that has long dreamt of a futuristic world where everyone is flying around in pods parked on their driveway.  

It精东影业 a concept that consumers have been fed for decades in Hollywood movies and science fiction novels, so it is perhaps no surprise that the anticipation surrounding the introduction of eVTOLs is building.  

The eVTOL developers are playing their part too with an incredibly efficient publicity machine that ensures every twist and turn of the aircraft精东影业 development is shared with the world.  

And the sums of money involved in developing the aircraft and building the infrastructure to support the eVTOL network are staggering.  

Only on April 25, 2024, one of the leading eVTOL innovators Archer Aviation announced that it had signed a multi-hundred-million-dollar agreement with Abu Dhabi. 

Designed to accelerate Archer精东影业 planned commercial air taxi operations in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the framework agreement includes in-country manufacturing, operations, and training across the region with operations set to commence in 2025.聽

Are eVTOLs for me?

CityAirbus NextGen prototype
Airbus

What is alarming about the rapid development of eVTOLs is there are still so many hoops to jump through before they can begin carrying passengers.聽聽

Public acceptance is an issue that will become more prevalent as awareness increases and counteracting the idea that eVTOLs are only for the very wealthy will be a tricky obstacle to overcome. 

However, there are also positive signs, such as the Chinese developer EHang becoming the first company in the world to obtain type certification for its flying taxi. 

But as aviation history has taught us, when all the problems are overcome that will still not be enough to ensure the survival of the eVTOL industry.  

Here are just some examples of incredible ideas and concepts that were brought to life but never fully realized their potential.聽

Airbus A380聽

Emirates Airbus A380
Emirates

In February 2019, following the news that Emirates was reducing its order for the Airbus A380 the planemaker announced production of its superjumbo would end in 2021.聽聽

It was an astonishing turn of events for an aircraft that promised so much but, in the end, failed to deliver. 

When the project to build the A380 was announced there were critics that said that an aircraft of its size was not viable, but few would have predicted the end would come so soon after its launch.  

The Airbus A380 is undoubtably a magnificent aircraft and it is great to see so many airlines increasing its use. But it acts as a perfect example for the eVTOL industry that a vision does not always translate into reality and sometimes critics are proved right.聽

颁辞苍肠辞谤诲别听

British Airways Concorde
British Airways

It is difficult to comprehend the levels of excitement that surrounded the launch of Concorde or how ahead of its time the aircraft was when it carried its first paying customers in 1969.聽聽

Concorde will always remain synonymous with British Airways and France but during development more than 100 non-binding orders were made for the supersonic jet from major airlines such as Lufthansa, Japan Airlines, American Airlines, United Airlines, Air India, and Air Canada.  

Much like the eVTOL industry today many airlines saw Concorde and supersonic flight as the future.  

However, 27 years after commercial operations both British Airways and Air France announced that they would retire their fleets.  

A fatal crash on July 25, 2000, shortly after an Air France Concorde took off from Paris, a drop in air travel following the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the United States (US), the aircraft精东影业 high fuel consumption leading to lack of profits and restrictions to only use supersonic speeds over the ocean all contributed to its downfall.  

For all its promise of being the future of flight, Concorde was unable to live up to the hype and its journey from development to becoming operational certainly chimes with the ambitions of eVTOL technology.  

But in many ways, maybe Concorde was just ahead of its time. And with the development of a new era of supersonic passenger aircraft, super speed travel will have its day again.聽聽

Space shuttle聽

Space Shuttle Columbia
NASA

Not strictly aviation, but the space shuttle is another concept that promised a great deal but perhaps did not achieve everything that was planned for it.聽聽

n February 1, 2003, Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated as it reentered the earth精东影业 atmosphere, killing all seven astronauts on board.聽

The event was the second space shuttle disaster since its inception following the loss of the Challenger crew in 1986.  

While the 2003 tragedy was certainly the immediate cause for ending the space shuttle project the cracks were already appearing, placing its future in jeopardy.  

When the last space shuttles were retired, they were not even halfway through their flight lifetimes, but the costs involved in operating the spacecraft had spiraled.  

While the spacecraft精东影业 many achievements included helping to build the International Space Station (ISS) and transporting the Hubble Space Telescope, the project was sold to the public as a low-cost way of accessing orbit and that turned out being wide off the mark. 

“The bottom-line answer is that it was too expensive. Way too expensive,” former Jet Propulsion Laboratory system engineer Mark Adler wrote for Newsweek in 2015. “The shuttle never met its promise for low-cost access to space by virtue of the system’s reusability.”聽

The advent of Space X has helped address many issues around expense but with each space shuttle project costing more than $1.5 billion it’s easy to see why it failed to reach its economical ambitions and alternatives needed to be found.聽聽聽

The jetpack

United Arab Emirates Dubai February 鈥28, 鈥2024, the World's First Jet Suit Race
Tarek ibrahim / Shutterstock.com

The jetpack was first thought to have been conceived more than 100 years ago by Russian Alexander Andreev, but it was not until Bell Aerosystems began developing the 鈥楤ell Rocket Belt鈥 in the 1950s that the technology was seen as a viable mode of flight.聽聽

Much of the early thinking was that jetpacks could be used by the US Army, whereas modern versions of the transportation system are also being marketed towards emergency responders, including police and mountain rescuers.  

While ultimately the jetpack industry has not failed, it has been an incredibly long journey that精东影业 never truly gotten off the ground due to cost, danger and the training requirements. 

However, there is hope with a handful of companies such as Jetpack Aviation, Frank Zapata精东影业 Flyboard Air, Gravity Industries and Maverick Aviation developing the concept.  

Maverick Aviation精东影业 jetpack is of particular interest as its patent pending flight control system provides automated stability, making it easier for a non-pilot to operate without extensive training.  

It is quite conceivable that with this type of development the jetpack will finally have its moment in the sun after over a century of development and, if it does, it will certainly have been worth the wait.聽聽

What do you think? Are eVTOL aircraft another brilliant aviation idea destined to fail? Feel free to share your comments below!

The post eVTOLs beware: why some of aviation精东影业 biggest promises ended in failure聽 appeared first on 精东影业.]]>
/articles/evtol-aircraft-fail-industry-concept/feed 2
Mountain rescue: can jetpacks replace helicopters to save people’s lives? /articles/31940-mountain-rescue-can-jetpacks-replace-helicopters Thu, 18 Aug 2022 13:07:04 +0000 https://www.aviatime.com/articles/31940-mountain-rescue-can-jetpacks-replace-helicopters They used to be the stuff of science fiction. But thanks to technological advances, jetpacks, devices with back-mounted…

The post Mountain rescue: can jetpacks replace helicopters to save people精东影业 lives? appeared first on 精东影业.]]>
They used to be the stuff of science fiction. But thanks to technological advances, jetpacks, devices with back-mounted engines and handheld controls, have become a reality. 

However, these flying machines, sought after by some for recreation and extreme sports, may also be suitable for search and rescue operations. In fact, a number of mountain rescue crews have already begun implementing jetpack technologies. 

Categories of jetpacks 

In order to consider whether a jetpack could be used to rescue people, it is important to look at the machine精东影业 design features. 

Depending on the nature of the power required, jetpacks can be divided into three categories: hydrogen peroxide-powered rocket packs, hydrojet packs, and turbojet packs.  

When it comes to hydrogen peroxide-powered rocket packs, the technology used is considered to be one of the oldest. These rocket packs are powered by hot gas which results from a chemical reaction when nearly pure hydrogen peroxide meets a catalyst, usually silver. Due to the exothermic reaction, a mixture of steam and hot gas is released, which is then directed into the rocket pack精东影业 nozzles to create a thrust that lifts the device off the ground. 

Meanwhile, hydrojet packs are designed slightly differently. The technology used to power hydrojet packs is similar to that used on a jet ski. It features a jet propulsion engine, which has an impeller that uses rotating fan blades to suck water into the engine and then forcefully eject it. Water is used as a high-density propulsion fluid which is supplied via a long flexible hose to feed the water to the jet nozzle pack attached to the pilot精东影业 body. A hydrojet pilot can control water flow rate using a remote actuator or a throttle. 

Unlike hydrojet packs, turbojet packs are equipped with wings and an engine fueled with standard kerosene-based jet fuel. However, this design is regarded as the most complex and so it is not as popular as other technologies used to power a jetpack. 

Helicopters vs jetpacks for mountain rescue 

Could jetpacks replace helicopters and other aircraft traditionally used to perform all-weather search and rescue operations?  

Typically, mountain rescue involves local mountaineers and hill walkers as well as professionally trained rescue professionals and aircrew who provide search and rescue helicopter (SAR) responses to emergency situations. The most common air vehicle used for mountain rescue activities is the SAR helicopter, which is usually equipped with crampons installed onto so-called ‘ice skates’ which help the craft to remain stable upon takeoff or landing in extreme weather conditions such as snow and ice.  

Another benefit of helicopter usage for mountain rescue is that the aircraft are usually equipped with medical equipment, including defibrillators, intravenous infusion sets, and comprehensive resuscitation kits as well as portable suction units and medical kits for critical patients. These helicopters can also feature additional medical equipment including chest drainage equipment, intubation equipment, amputation sets, and patient immobilizing kits. 

So, what精东影业 the argument for using jetpacks? 

Because of a jetpack精东影业 ability to reach average speeds of more than 130 kilometers per hour (or around 80 miles per hour), rescuers could use single-pilot flying machines when an immediate response is essential. Unlike helicopters, jetpacks feature a high level of maneuverability that allows rescue crews to get to people who need medical help in hard-to-reach areas.  

For instance, paramedics of the UK-based Great North Air Ambulance (GNAA) have been testing the British inventor精东影业 Richard Browning jet suit called the Daedalus Flight Pack. The jetpack can produce up to 144 kilograms (317 lbs) of thrust at full throttle from a pack of high-discharge LiPo batteries, so it can ascend quickly and save time in case of emergency. 

The jet suit features five small engines: two engines on each arm of a pilot as well as one which is attached to the pilot精东影业 back. This technology allows the paramedic to control the jetpack by moving their hands and allows them to conduct short flights at low altitudes. 

Paramedics from the GNAA have that it could take up to 90 seconds for a jetpack pilot to reach a patient in an area where it would take up to 30 minutes to land with a helicopter. And even though a flying paramedic couldn鈥檛 carry the same amount of medical equipment as a helicopter, a jetpack pilot is able to bring between 10 and 15 kilograms (22 to 33 lbs) of first aid supplies, including a medical kit with pharmaceuticals, a defibrillator and other patient-monitoring devices. 

The lack of legal regulations 

But if it is possible for a jetpack pilot to carry medical equipment, why are these flying machines not yet widely used for mountain rescue operations? 

Even though UK paramedics were among the first to initiate trials of jetpacks, there are currently no legal regulations covering such operations in Europe or the United States, making it essentially illegal to fly jetpacks for rescue operations. 

Another major issue to solve before jetpacks could be widely deployed for search and rescue is the high cost of operating and maintaining the technology. For example, the price for the Daedalus Flight Pack stands at around $440,000 per unit. The jetpack also burns approximately three liters (or a gallon) of jet fuel per minute, which makes it expensive to operate. 

It is also important to consider the safety aspect. A jetpack does not feature proper safety equipment to protect the pilot in case of an incident or technical malfunction. Since such a device falls into an experimental category of aircraft, a person willing to fly a jetpack has to complete flight training to hold a Light Sports Aircraft (LSA) pilot certificate. This suggests that in the future paramedics may be also required to complete specific training before flying to rescue missions. 

 

The post Mountain rescue: can jetpacks replace helicopters to save people精东影业 lives? appeared first on 精东影业.]]>
Where are our jetpacks? /articles/30716-where-are-our-jetpacks Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:40:15 +0000 https://www.aviatime.com/articles/30716-where-are-our-jetpacks For more than a century now the jetpack has been a staple of science fiction. From 1930s comics…

The post Where are our jetpacks? appeared first on 精东影业.]]>

For more than a century now the jetpack has been a staple of science fiction.

From 1930s comics and 1960s television shows to a resurgence in entrepreneurial interest during the 2000s, the jetpack has continued to capture our collective imagination. After all, a backpack-sized object that would allow any person to take to the sky like Ironman through the power of space-age technology is enough to whet anyone精东影业 appetite.

The technology has always seemed within our grasp, and the days where jetpacks might become part of our daily commute, or at least an affordable pastime for extreme sports enthusiasts, felt tantalizing close. However, our excitement seems to have been premature as commercially viable jetpacks have yet to materialize.

But still we yearn for the future that never came. 鈥淲here are our jetpacks?鈥 the people demand. 鈥淲here is the version of the future we were once promised?鈥

So, why aren鈥檛 jetpacks readily available by now? And will we ever pilot our very own jetpacks? 精东影业 investigates.

The name

First and foremost, it must be established that not all jetpacks are created equal. In fact, not all jetpacks are jetpacks. As the name suggests, a jetpack must have a jet engine and resemble a backpack, at least to some degree.

The former of the two prerequisites is quite problematic. In popular culture, most depictions, such as the King of Rocket Men, a black and white movie serial from the 1940s, or the Rocketeer from the 1991 film of the same name, feature non-airbreathing rocket engines. The most well-known real-life jetpack, flown by James Bond in Thunderball (1965), also uses rockets for propulsion.

The official name of that particular jetpack is the Bell Rocket Belt, which doesn鈥檛 quite have the same ring to it. There is simply no denying that 鈥榡etpack鈥 entered the public consciousness while its alternatives did not.

‘Pack鈥, the second prerequisite, also comes with its own share of problems. Many jetpacks, especially those with actual jet engines, are much more complex and extend beyond the dimensions of even the largest backpacks. Some, such as the appropriately named Jet Suit developed by Gravity Industries, have additional engines attached to the pilot精东影业 arms and legs. Others consist of several washing machine-sized turbines that completely erase the standard image of the jetpack altogether.

Some jetpacks have wings, others don鈥檛. Some can perform a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL), others cannot. And while it is tempting to acknowledge that they belong to different categories, such as wing packs, jet suits, rocket belts and turbine pants, two arguments speak to the contrary.

Firstly, all these contraptions aspire to imitate the same model – the compact, sleek, and endlessly stylish jetpack seen in comic books and films. They are based on the idea of an individual flying machine which barely extends beyond the wearer精东影业 body.

Secondly, it is difficult to teach the public the subtleties of differentiating a jet from a rocket and a pack from a suit. Especially when we consider how engrained the idea of a 鈥榡et pack鈥 has become in popular culture and how it tends to operate as a catch-all term. Perhaps the typology of individual aerial transportation devices will become more widely known in the future when these devices become as commonplace as bikes. Currently, this does not seem realistic.

Consequently, any similar invention is categorized under the umbrella term 鈥榡etpack鈥.

This kind of generalization reflects some of the reasons why jetpacks have not entered the mainstream, mainly the physics behind the ways of making humans fly.

The rocket problem

Fictional jetpacks used rockets for one simple reason – they were conceived before the invention (or at least widespread knowledge) of the jet engine. Many real jetpacks use rockets as they offer significantly better thrust-to-weight ratio.

In order to function, the jetpack must lift the pilot, itself, and its fuel into the air. The bigger the difference between how much the engine weighs and how much it can lift, the better. The thrust-to-weight ratio of most jet engines varies between five and eight, meaning that they can lift five to eight times their own weight. Not bad.

However, the ratio of rocket engines tends to be 10 and more times bigger than that of jet engines. The Merlin 1D, which powers SpaceX精东影业 Falcon 9, has thrust-to-weight ratio of more than 180, illustrating that a rocket-powered jetpack can be significantly smaller and lighter and, therefore, can carry a greater weight.

However, the insane thrust of rockets also comes with an enormous downside as they are incredibly fuel hungry. One Merlin 1D burns more than 30,000 kilograms (66,000 pounds) of liquid oxygen during the Falcon 9精东影业 three-minute journey to the edge of space.聽

The Bell Rocket Belt used hydrogen peroxide for fuel and burned 19 liters (5 gallons), allowing for 21 seconds of flight, nearly a liter per second. With such heavy fuel consumption, any practical use of the device went out the window.

The US Army, which ordered the development of the Bell Rocket Belt, dropped the idea of equipping soldiers with jetpacks after it became clear that under no circumstances could a more compact, convenient jetpack with longer flight times be developed.聽

The Bell Rocket Belt was relegated to a showpiece, wowing the crowd with tiny hops at various events. During the opening ceremony of the 1984 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles, it its long-time test pilot, Willy Suitor (a stunt pilot for Sean Connery in Thunderball), as the fuel tank was slightly over-pressurized, making the whole unit overweight.

It was only Suitor精东影业 mastery with the controls that prevented a horrible catastrophe. After all, not only are rockets powerful, but they are also incredibly hazardous. In the best-case scenario, a crash of an unfortunate jetpacker would result in a fireball, and in the worst-case, poisonous hydrogen peroxide would escape, burning the eyes, lungs and skin of anyone in its vicinity.

While not all rocket fuels are equally dangerous during the event of failure, all rockets are incredibly dangerous when operated. Not only do they expel a tower of white smoke (as seen in popular depictions), but this is also accompanied by an ear-shattering roar and scorching heat.

The Rocket Belt精东影业 nozzles were placed far away from the pilot and directed away from the wearer精东影业 body. However, if an unfortunate pilot had decided to put their leg in the way of the jet stream, the 280 pound-force of the engine could strip the flesh from the appendage in no time. The same would happen if a person decided to stand too close to a working rocket pack.

The jet era

However, technological advancements made during recent decades have reinvigorated the idea of the jetpack. In recent years, it even became possible to build a jet engine small and powerful enough to be suitable for an individual transportation device.

This resulted in an uptick of ventures in the early 21st century all offering various high-tech takes on the jetpack. Air-breathing engines avoid many of the downsides experienced when using rockets and they tend to be less hazardous, and a lot less fuel hungry.

While there is still a danger of losing an unfortunately placed limb, at least now the flight time is not measured in seconds. Gravity Industries Jet Suit, invented by Richard聽Browning and sold by his company, can stay in the air for one to five minutes depending on the load, thanks to its five gas turbine engines, four of which are attached to the pilot精东影业 arms. Jetpack Aviation精东影业 JB11, with six turbojets in a more conventional backpack configuration, is advertised as having an endurance of 10 minutes, which would be just enough for a flight to the nearest mall in your average floating city.

However, the price for this fantasy trip will have to be paid with very real dollars. Reports from a few years ago indicate the cost of Browning精东影业 Jet Suit as $440,000, while the JB11 comes in slightly cheaper at $340,000, which is the price of a small private airplane. There is little information about maintenance and operational costs of the devices but, given the fact that they are non-mass produced and require some advanced materials and manufacturing techniques, it is quite likely that the upkeep cost would be significantly higher than that of your average Cessna.

And even with that in mind, five-to-ten minutes is barely enough to cover several kilometers before the need to refuel.

“The energy density of the jet fuel still makes the difference quite marginal,鈥 Browning told 精东影业, adding that, in part, this is thanks to the inherent disadvantages that come with the size.

鈥渊辞耻 lose efficiency. Think of massive modern airliner engines. They’re big because they’re efficient. Ours are tiny and they are not very efficient,鈥 he said

Both the technology and the efficiency of jet engines continue to improve, and the mass production could, in theory, solve the issue of the cost. But it would create a host of other problems.

The human factor

Flying machines tend to be far more difficult to control than those that operate on the ground. The addition of a third direction – 鈥榰p鈥 – really tends to complicate things, as does the lack of traction. Performing a vertical landing is a whole other level of mastery.

Another reason why the US Military dropped the Bell Rocket Belt was the pilot was required to use both hands to control it, which excluded the possibility of operating any kind of equipment. Controlling the device required a lot of concentration and skill, as the pilot was essentially balancing on the two rocket nozzles.

The problem of controllability has always been a major issue in preventing all kinds of flying machines from gaining mass appeal. Like jetpacks, flying cars have been plagued by these problems, and only recently, with the advent of effective artificial intelligence (AI) that can eliminate the human from the controls, have they become somewhat 谤别补濒颈蝉迟颈肠.听

There is an indication that the same rule also applies to jetpacks, and without making them fully AI-controlled we simply can鈥檛 make them safe. But the companies that manufacture them are not giving up without a fight. Both Gravity Industries and Jetpack Aviation offer jetpack flying courses, and both claim to be able to teach a person to fly the pack within a couple of days. However, there is no denying that such flights are for entertainment purposes only. Making short hops in a sparsely populated area is one thing, trusting people to control what is essentially a missile in an urban environment, is another.

Browning does not hide the fact that the suit has a rather limited application in the real world due to its cost and complexity. His main target is the military, which has its own way of teaching people to operate complex machinery and making it reasonably safe. Apart from this, and perhaps a jetpack racing series Gravity Industries is currently working on, the potential for the jetpack to enter the mainstream is very limited, Browning claims.

David Mayman, founder of Jetpack Aviation, is equally skeptical of jetpacks being used by the lay public. While his company continues to work on new models of jetpacks, it is also pivoting towards other kinds of air transportation, mainly the Speeder, which is marketed as a 鈥渇lying motorcycle鈥.

I don’t think it will be JetPacks that we see carrying people around cities in the future but aircraft like the Speeder, that can be operated fully autonomously, have a great future. Just as there are sedans and also motorcycles on the road I believe there will be large flying cars and also flying motorcycles (carrying 1-2 people),鈥 Mayman told 精东影业 via LinkedIn.

While there is no shortage of companies working on the similar concepts, it is still unclear if flying cars 鈥 as well as autonomous flying cars – will ever become widespread modes of transportation. However, a future with flying automobiles and bicycles seems far more likely than one with jetpacks.

Continuing on from Mayman精东影业 statement, in such a future the classic jetpack would be like a monowheel with an internal combustion engine. Somewhat impressive, but hardly practical.

Swapping an internal combustion engine for an electric one could make things more appealing, however. According to Browning, there could be a market for this, and his company is already working on an electric version of a jetpack, which (while removing the last trace of 鈥榡et鈥 from the device) also tackles some of the dangers posed by jetpacks.

鈥淭here are ongoing revolutions in battery technology. Imagine a colder, quieter, simpler to operate, frankly – less-moving-parts-type of setup with an electric version where all the energy to fly for ten minutes is in the palm of your hand,鈥 Browning said, while admitting that such a setup, if possible, is still quite far away.

But there is another more important point to discuss. The main appeal of the jetpack is unparalleled individual mobility, the possibility to take to the skies wherever and whenever the need arises. While lacked in the 鈥榗ool factor鈥, this is exactly what flying cars and motorcycles will offer.

So, where are our jetpacks? They are here and just as impressive as the comic books predicted. But they are also incredibly dangerous and expensive.

A more practical version remains in the future, but its form may be a bit different than expected.

The post Where are our jetpacks? appeared first on 精东影业.]]>
FAA and FBI leaning towards 鈥榖alloon theory鈥 for LA Jetpack Man /articles/29353-faa-and-fbi-leaning-towards-la-jetpack-man-balloon-theory Wed, 03 Nov 2021 14:18:58 +0000 https://www.aviatime.com/articles/29353-faa-and-fbi-leaning-towards-la-jetpack-man-balloon-theory The United States Federal Investigation Bureau and the Federal Aviation Agency say the jetpack man, seen by several…

The post FAA and FBI leaning towards 鈥榖alloon theory鈥 for LA Jetpack Man appeared first on 精东影业.]]>
The United States Federal Investigation Bureau and the Federal Aviation Agency say the jetpack man, seen by several pilots on approach to Los Angeles International Airport (LAX), may have been a stray party balloon.

鈥淭he FAA has worked closely with the FBI to investigate reported jetpack sightings in the Los Angeles area. So far, none of these sightings have been verified,鈥 FAA and FBI in joint statements to NBC Los Angeles. 

“One working theory is that pilots might have seen balloons,” the statements said.

A video, filmed by a Los Angeles Police Department helicopter in November 2020, and obtained by NBC LA in November 2021, might have been instrumental in developing this theory. 

The video shows a human-sized balloon, modelled on Jack Skellington, a character from 1993 Tim Burton film 鈥楢 Nightmare Before Christmas鈥.

According to the FBI statement, it is possible that all five sightings (four of which were reported between August and December 2020, with the fifth reported in July 2021) could well have been different human-shaped balloons that drifted into the flightpath of the aircraft approaching LAX.

Throughout a year-long investigation, the FBI and FAA have not been able to find additional witnesses or video evidence of the Jetpack Man, besides the reports from pilots. 

One report from July 28, 2021, which was made by a pilot of a Kalitta Air Cargo Boeing 747 on approach to LAX, described the Jetpack Man as wearing a 鈥渞ed outfit鈥.

A short video, captured from an aircraft in December 2020, revealed the Jetpack Man as having a distinctly different shape to Jack Skellington, lending credence to the theory that different balloons, or even objects, could have been responsible for the sightings. 

The post FAA and FBI leaning towards 鈥榖alloon theory鈥 for LA Jetpack Man appeared first on 精东影业.]]>